Quote:
No that's not fair, I know most Councils can be pretty useless at clear answers and prompt action. Unless it's a soft target, then they are instant. This one excels though
I forgot to mention, when I was giving my statement today I was showing the Ranger the photos I had again. The first ones she could infringe for but the second day I had pictures of one of the dogs in my yard she couldn't infringe for because the dogs head wasn't in the photo so she couldn't identify it for sure. My camera also took a 15 second video of the dog on that second day, which in the background you can hear someone yelling the dogs names "Bella and ??". The ranger could understand what both the names in the video were, but I could only make out the first name (which annoyingly was the other dog, not the one in my picture). The ranger said if I could get the second name we might be able to use the video as evidence to fine them for the second day. So i'm there guessing random dog names that kind of sound like the muffled words i'm hearing. The ranger obviously knew that the dog "Bella" was the others mate, and she knew what what being said for the other name but for some reason her being able to ID it but not me meant it didn't count.. It was like some cruel Rumpelstiltskin thing! I feel like you could go to jail for murder on less evidence than this.